The Italian Memorandum

“Behold now is the favorable time; behold now is the day of salvation”

(2 Cor. 6:2)

The gospel was meant to be accepted (2 Cor. 11:4).  The gospel must be accepted because it was meant to be accepted; meant by the Lord to be received by men (Acts 11:1; 1 Thess. 2:13).  The appeal of the gospel always has urgency and expectancy within its message (2 Cor. 6:2).

1. Accepting the gospel is an individual affair.  Notice the emphasis upon “each one” in 2 Corinthians 5:10, and throughout the New Testament.  Individual responsibility is clearly meant.

2.Accepting the gospel entails ownership. Ownership also infers responsibility-a right of possession.  2 Peter 1:1,3,4,8,12, etc.  indicate ownership by verbs such as-“have obtained,” “granted to us,” and “you have.”

3. Accepting the gospel means accepting the consequences of following Christ (1 Pet. 4:12-19).

My son has a personal web site which displays the Sphinx of Egypt; the Eiffel Tower of Paris; and the Tower of Pisa.  All of these are places which he has visited in person.  They are not mere hopes nor dreams; but for him they are realities, facts, moments of his life.  Is the gospel such a reality for you?   Have you owned it yet?

Robert M. Housby

“And so we came to Rome”

(Acts 28:14)

The Appian Way (Via Appia in Latin and Italian), is the route which Paul’s captors used when he was brought to Rome.  It is the most important ancient Roman road.  It is designated after Appius Claudius.

The main part of the road was begun and finished in 312 B.C.  Tight and interlocking stones provided a flat surface.  Some of the stones were said  to fit so well that a knife could not slide between the stones.  The via Appia is the first Roman road believed to have featured the use of lime cement.

The Germans in WWII counterattacked the Allies down the via Appia from the Alban Hills.  And, perhaps the most pitiful scene is that of the crucifixion of Sparticus and his 6000 along the Via Appia.  But, for Paul, the crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth and the gospel message of the kingdom of God was the reason for his famed walk down the via Appia.

Acts 28:24 records two responses to Paul’s arrival and message-“some were convinced…but others disbelieved” .  These two responses are as relevant today as when Paul came to Rome on the via Appia.  These responses serve to remind us that Challenge & Response is the nature of the call of the gospel;  Some will, but most will not (Matt. 7:21-23).  What is your response to the gospel?

-Robert M. Housby

(Your Self-Test)

“But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such there is no law”

(Galatians 5:22,23)

Circle either the ? or the !

1. How are you doing with love ? !

2. How are you doing with joy ? !

3. How are you doing with peace ? !

4. How are you doing with patience ? !

5. How are you doing with kindness ? !

6. How are you doing with goodness ? !

7. How are you doing with faithfulness ? !

8. How are you doing with gentleness ? !

9. How are you doing with self-control ? !

This Self-Test will help you to evaluate your own end of the year spirituality. Let’s get ready for a productive 2009!

-Robert M. Housby

“Blessed are you, O LORD, the God of Israel”

(1 Chronicles 29:10)

Christians should bear in mind that they are recipients of the gospel plan of salvation which came through Abraham (Gal. 3:14,29; Rom. 11:18). Gentiles (non-Jews), therefore, share in the rich history and scriptural foundations of Israel (Rom. 15:4,27). The Hebrew blessings are a part of this illustrious heritage.

The Hebrew Blessings are precisely that-blessings which come through the Hebrew language and theological format (Gen. 14:13; 40:15; Ex. 3:15,18). The apostle Paul is an example of how this Hebrew style was perpetuated through the centuries (Acts 22:2; Phil. 3:5). Modifications and deviations from this were noted as pejorative (negative) according to Nehemiah 13:23-24. While the gospel has no one accepted language today (Acts 10:46), we are privileged, indeed, to have access to the Hebrew blessings.

The Hebrew Blessings often appear in simple Hebraic words: brief, pointed, and powerful. These attest to the God of heaven as Daniel 2:19-20 records-“Then Daniel blessed the God of heaven. Daniel answered and said: Blessed be the name of God forever and ever…”

-Robert M. Housby

“…your young men shall see visions,

and your old men shall dream dreams…”

(Acts 2:17)

Students of the Bible must be careful to distinguish between first century miraculous abilities and 21^st century belief in and application of the miraculously confirmed biblical word (see Hebrews 2:3-4). Modern-day charismatics are unquestionably involved in a non-equivalent activity, despite their grandiose claims.  The former was obtained only by transference through the “laying on of hands” by one of the original apostles; read the Acts sequence in context: 5:12; 6:5-8; 8:9-19).    That, having been prefaced, leads us to examine one of the ever important and always timely verses of Scripture, Acts 2:17.

Possible interpretations of this section:

A.    The “visions” and “dreams” are actual dream states (see Heb. 1:1).

B.     The v. and d. are meant to be interpreted  figuratively as turning points of inner  resolution for all men-young, old, male, and female.

C.     The v. and d. are apocalyptic symbols depicting the commencement                  of a new and fresh era-the Christian Age.

D.    The v. and d. are a combination of the above possibilities.

Certainly, the age of Christ has dawned; and a turning point of inner resolution is now possible.

-Robert M. Housby

I. The Greek Classical View of Heaven (Acts 14:8-18)

A. “The word always has a double reference” (Kittel, 497).

1. Cosmological sense (starry heavens)

2. Theological view (habitation of the gods/myth)

=>”The gods have come down to us” (Acts 14:11)

B. Ouranos meant both physical and metaphysical in Greek culture, and eventually came to denote by the New Testament period a guiding principle (as astrology in the Roman World). This concept of heaven became a flurry of philosophical activity from Homer, Pythagoras, Aristotle, and Plato, and others. In fact, Plato taught that heaven (ouranos) was the starting point for absolute knowledge (Phaedrus, 247b).

II. Old Testament/shamayim

A. shamayim is identified with raqia (Gen. 1:6-8)

B. a place of fixed references (Gen. 1:14; Ps. 119:89)

C. The Bethel Story and the dwelling place of God (Gen. 28)

D. The God of heaven formula (Deut. 26:15; 32:40; Ex. 9:29,33)

E. Source of all blessing (Gen. 49:25; Deut. 33:13; 1 Ki. 8:35)

F. Especially salvation-history (Dan. 7:17)

III. New Testament/ouranos

A. Jn. 3:9-12; 6:33 Jesus’ source

B. Acts 1:9-11; 2:34 Jesus will come again

C. 2 Cor. 5:1-9 Heaven holds all to me

D. Eph. 1:3 etc. The Christian’s position

Robert M. Housby

[A sermon about proselytes will be delivered in May, 2008]

“Now when the congregation had broken up, many of the Jews and devout proselytes followed Paul and Baranbas, who, speaking to them persuaded them to continue in the grace of God”

(Acts 13:43)

The term “proselyte” or “proselytes” may be found once in the Gospels (Matthew 23:15) and three times in Acts (2:10; 6:5; and, 13:43); for a total of four references. The Greek term for proselyte is used in each of these references. A working definition of a proselyte is—“a convert from one religious belief or party to another” (Nelson’s Illustrated Bible Dictionary, p.881). Perhaps, the greatest Jewish example of a proselyte is in Ruth, the Moabitess (see Ruth 1:16-17).

There appear to be two kinds of proselytes during New Testament times. The first group are sometimes referred to as “proselytes of the gate;” the second group, “proselytes of righteousness.” The difference between the two groups are degrees of commitment. Proselytes of the Gate seem to have preferred the monotheism and high ethics of Judaism in stark contrast with their former idolatrous heathen backgrounds. Proselytes of Righteousness, on the other hand, wholeheartedly accepted all of the Judaic commands, including circumcision. The Law of Moses did make reference to Gentiles who would come to embrace Judaism (Ex. 20:10; Deut. 5:14). The meaning of the English “proselyte” (proselytos) derives from proserchomai, meaning “to come unto.”

In this sense, therefore, both Jewish proselytes and Christians are Messiah focused (Matt. 11:28); God-fearing (Acts 13:16); and, resident aliens (1 Pet. 2:11).

– Robert M. Housby

“And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, Save yourselves from this crooked generation. So those who received his word were baptized…”

(Acts 2:40,41)

The Book of Acts documents that the early gospel preachers, including the original apostles, consistently offered the gospel invitation—an opportunity to respond to the gospel message (2:40-41; 11:19-21; 17:30-34; 18:8). There were other types of responses to the gospel as well:

1. Restoration (see Acts 8:14-24). Here we see that Simon needed restoration due to his heart not being right before God (8:21). Simon was directed to repent (8:22a) and pray (8:22b) for forgiveness (8:22c).
2. Placed Membership (9:26).
3. Edification (16:5; 20:32-38).
4. Rejection (17:5-6), and,
5. Conversion, of course (18:8).

The Gospel Invitation is based upon the old Jewish heritage where the Man of God calls upon the people to decide in favor of the true and living God (see Jeremiah 10:10): Moses before the Israelites (Ex. 32:26); Joshua before the Promised Land (Josh 24:15); and Ezra before the exiles (Ezra 10:10-11); and, of course, Jesus (Matt. 23:27-39; 11:28-30).

-Robert M. Housby

“For a man named Demetrius, a silversmith, who made silver shrines
of Artemis, brought no little business to the craftsmen…”

(Acts 19:24)

We have been told by some that they are not ready to make a commitment to the Lord and his church (see Ephesians 3:21 on Christ and church). Strangely, however, one such individual with whom we have been working for years now, whom we love, continues to hold diametrically opposite beliefs. How disappointing it is when such a one voices how they faithfully pray to the Lord for daily strength and security, while simultaneously verbalizing that they are not yet ready to give their life to Christ as their Lord.

This packaging of Jesus as a “good luck charm Jesus,” rather than the Lord of the universe who is the Christ of Scripture, reminds us of the superstitious Artemis (Diana) worship that existed in ancient Asia (see Acts 19:23-41). One could even purchase a little silver shrine to aid and support one’s journey through life. Is it possible that Jesus could become so reduced as to become such a little shrine in one’s heart for protection without any commitment? Those with this mindset are either deceived, naive, or both.

One thing is for certain, Jesus Christ is not a bell-hop; not an amulet; not a lucky charm. He is the one who demands repentance and faith (Acts 20:21); who commands repentance and judgment (Acts 17:30,31). What shall it be, then, Leprechaun or Lord?

-Robert M. Housby

It is not only permissible for Christians in America to participate in the political process (according to the New Testament) it is redemptive and God glorifying.

1. Christian doctrine endorses subjection to the American political process (see Romans 13:1-7). Fortunately, in the American system a citizen of the country may have a voice and a vote. But this voice and vote are to be for “good” (not evil) and as “servants of God”(not servants against God) (see 1 Peter 2:13-17).
2. Christian examples of Paul and his associates models for all time approved apostolic examples of participation in the political process. See Acts 16:35-40 and 26:1,32 for evidence of this both on the local and the imperial level.

3. Christian purpose was, perhaps, never clearer than when Jesus said in Matthew 5:14-16 “You are the light of the world…let your light shine before others that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven.” Notice, here, that privatization of one’s faith is the very opposite of what the Lord meant.

Political issues are often moral issues. When Jesus said, “Judge righteous judgment” (John 7:24) he endorsed for all time that Christians should use their voice and their vote for good not evil. Yes, we are aware that some in America are citing “separation of church and state” as grounds for Christians to hush their mouths. The fact is, however, that Thomas Jefferson uttered those words, January 1, 1802, to reassure the Danbury Baptist Association of Connecticut of their continued and uninterrupted expression of Christian faith. Current attempts to infer that this is a constitutional matter have another agenda in mind.

Secular humanists are not only anti-Bible and anti-Christ, they are against the very Founders of our own Nation. Will you participate in the political process as a Christian?

-Robert M. Housby